#X PLANE 10 PC FULL#

I can give you a run down on FPS with everything maxed out (but I have no idea how it will perform yet). If you had a few old one's, you could do something similar with a basic get up, allowing the main machine to do the display side.ДЄll that said, my PC bits turn up tomorrow, I am getting an i7 (Hasswell E) extreme processor (there are 3 and mine is the mid priced one), 16Gb RAM, Asus X99 Motherboard, GTX980 MSI Graphics card and a 2Tb SSHD (SSD and Sata Hard drive hybrid).

#X PLANE 10 PC FULL#

I've known people get all hung up over this, that and the other at the end of the day, you could easily buy a 3K machine and think that that's the best, but someone somewhere will have a better / cheaper / or more expensive way of doing it.ДЄ mate who has a full 737 cockpit uses about 6 computers the fastest is done solely for graphics, and the rest are mediocre one's to run panels, glass displays etc. Not sure what the difference between Prepar3d and FSX are. On the same kit, Prepar3d v2 is faster than the original. Prepar3d will utilise the graphics card for calculations, XPlane will utilise 16GB RAM, it can use more but there's not much more benefit.ДЄlso, consider Prepar3d. Also, the way they work are totally different since XPlane renders the immediate surroundings of the aircraft to work out what it should be doing, and FSx Doesn't. X Plane uses Open GL, so it's more CPU intensive.

Also, whilst a fast CPU is absolutely important, as FSX uses Direct X to render, so is a decent graphics card (and I would recommend NVidia)

X plane 10 pc